Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Descriptive Clinical Study.

OBJECTIVE: The investigators aimed to describe the clinical experience of a single center reporting on neuropsychiatric findings among patients experiencing persistent symptoms as part of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) infection. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively (between February 2020 and May 2021) from a cohort (N=100) within a COVID-19 survivors study of patients with persistent symptoms enrolled after a short inpatient stay or who had been outpatients never hospitalized. Patients without confirmatory positive PCR or antibody diagnostic test results were grouped separately as presumptive cases (N=13). RESULTS: Of the 87 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2, 63 (72.4%) were female, and 65 (74.7%) were White. The mean age was 49.2 years (SD=14.9). The most prevalent symptoms after COVID-19 infection were fatigue, "brain fog," headache, anxiety, and sleep issues. Attention and executive function were frequently impaired. The mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 26.0 (SD=2.8). Concentration and attention as well as memory issues were both significantly correlated with the complaint of brain fog. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 vary in frequency and duration with relation to premorbid history and that these conditions affect functional domains and patients' ability to return to work. Longitudinal research with larger cohorts is needed to characterize PASC and to optimize care, especially for vulnerable populations.

Telemedicine in Behavioral Neurology-Neuropsychiatry: Opportunities and Challenges Catalyzed by COVID-19.

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has profoundly impacted the well-being of society and the practice of medicine across health care systems worldwide. As with many other subspecialties, the clinical paradigm in behavioral neurology and neuropsychiatry (BN-NP) was transformed abruptly, transitioning to real-time telemedicine for the assessment and management of the vast majorities of patient populations served by our subspecialty. In this commentary, we outline themes from the BN-NP perspective that reflect the emerging lessons we learned using telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Positive developments include the ability to extend consultations and management to patients in our high-demand field, maintenance of continuity of care, enhanced ecological validity, greater access to a variety of well-reimbursed telemedicine options (telephone and video) that help bridge the digital divide, and educational and research opportunities. Challenges include the need to adapt the mental state examination to the telemedicine environment, the ability to perform detailed motor neurologic examinations in patients where motor features are important diagnostic considerations, appreciating nonverbal cues, managing acute safety and behavioral concerns in less controlled environments, and navigating intervention-based (neuromodulation) clinics requiring in-person contact. We hope that our reflections help to catalyze discussions that should take place within the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, the American Neuropsychiatric Association, and allied organizations regarding how to optimize real-time telemedicine practices for our subspecialty now and into the future.

COVID-19 and telepsychiatry: Early outpatient experiences and implications for the future.

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically transformed the U.S. healthcare landscape. Within psychiatry, a sudden relaxing of insurance and regulatory barriers during the month of March 2020 enabled clinicians practicing in a wide range of settings to quickly adopt virtual care in order to provide critical ongoing mental health supports to both existing and new patients struggling with the pandemic's impact. In this article, we briefly review the extensive literature supporting the effectiveness of telepsychiatry relative to in-person mental health care, and describe how payment and regulatory challenges were the primary barriers preventing more widespread adoption of this treatment modality prior to COVID-19. We then review key changes that were implemented at the federal, state, professional, and insurance levels over a one-month period that helped usher in an unprecedented transformation in psychiatric care delivery, from mostly in-person to mostly virtual. Early quality improvement data regarding virtual visit volumes and clinical insights from our outpatient psychiatry department located within a large, urban, tertiary care academic medical center reflect both the opportunities and challenges of virtual care for patients and providers. Notable benefits have included robust clinical volumes despite social distancing mandates, reduced logistical barrieres to care for many patients, and decreased no-show rates. Finally, we provide clinical suggestions for optimizing telepsychiatry based on our experience, make a call for advocacy to continue the reduced insurance and regulatory restrictions affecting telepsychiatry even once this public health crisis has passed, and pose research questions that can help guide optimal utilization of telepsychiatry as mainstay or adjunct of outpatient psychiatric treatment now and in the future.